Content
The Lift the Exponent (LTE) lemma is a theorem commonly used in elementary number theory.
Define νp(n) as the exponent of the prime factor p in the standard factorization of integer n; that is, νp(n) satisfies pνp(n)∣n and pνp(n)+1∤n.
Because the LTE lemma is lengthy, we divide it into three parts:
In what follows, let p be prime, let x,y be integers satisfying p∤x and p∤y, and let n be a positive integer.
Part I
For every prime p and integer n satisfying (n,p)=1:
-
If p∣x−y, then:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)
-
If p∣x+y, then for odd n:
νp(xn+yn)=νp(x+y)
Proof
If p∣x−y, then it is easy to see that p∣x−y⟺x≡y(modp), so clearly:
i=0∑n−1xiyn−1−i≡nxn−1≡0(modp)
It follows from xn−yn=(x−y)∑i=0n−1xiyn−1−i that the statement is proved.
The case p∣x+y is proved similarly.
Part II
If p is an odd prime:
-
If p∣x−y, then:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)+νp(n)
-
If p∣x+y, then for odd n:
νp(xn+yn)=νp(x+y)+νp(n)
Proof
If p∣x−y, let y=x+kp; we only need to prove the case p∣n.
-
If n=p, then by the binomial theorem:
i=0∑p−1xp−1−iyi=i=0∑p−1xp−1−ij=0∑i(ji)xj(kp)i−j≡pxp−1(modp2)
Therefore:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)+1
-
If n=pa, mathematical induction gives:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)+a
Therefore, the statement is proved.
The case p∣x+y is proved similarly.
Part III
If p=2 and p∣x−y:
-
For odd n (the same as item 1 of Part I):
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)
-
For even n:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)+νp(x+y)+νp(n)−1
In addition, for the above x,y,n, we have:
If 4∣x−y, then:
- ν2(x+y)=1
- ν2(xn−yn)=ν2(x−y)+ν2(n)
Proof
We only need to prove the case where n is even. Since p∤(2p) in this case, we cannot use the method from Part II.
Let n=2ab, where a=νp(n) and 2∤b. Then:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x2a−y2a)=νp((x−y)(x+y)i=1∏a−1(x2i+y2i))
Note that 2∣x−y⟹4∣x2−y2, so (∀i≥1), x2i+y2i≡2(mod4). Thus the equation above becomes:
νp(xn−yn)=νp(x−y)+νp(x+y)+νp(n)−1
Therefore, the statement is proved.
References
- Lifting-the-exponent lemma - Wikipedia